Popular Post
Recent Post

Monday, May 23, 2011

1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii

1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Continental Mark III
  • 1958 Continental Mark III



  • kiljoy616
    Apr 11, 02:47 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)



    The marantz one is, you have to pay $40 to uPgrade firmware to get AirPlay working at all. At least you did with early versions, not sure about current versions, AirPlay may work without upgrade with those.

    Ok this makes no real sense to I figure Apple is behind it. Merantz and Denon both have upgrade and both same price. Are they for real, come on Airplay upgrade WTF. I smell Apple crazy behind it. :rolleyes:

    I guess its a software upgrade to their internal chip, but I still think its stupid, if your going to buy a 1000 plus receiver this is just dam bad PR to me.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Lincoln Continental Mark III
  • Lincoln Continental Mark III



  • Jason Beck
    Jan 11, 05:21 PM
    Windows user here for at least a decade. This is obviously propaganda to promote some sort of upcoming suite of software for OSX to prevent "viruses" lol. Yawn. I am right now on my Windows box as I don't have a Mac at the moment but I have owned several. The only way your Mac can be infected with anything is through stupidity.




    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark
  • 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark



  • milo
    Sep 5, 05:48 PM
    In order to receive the movie from the movie store it would stream to the "box".Having a HD would allow you to save the movie.

    AND!!

    Later in your room you could stream it from the "Box" to your computer :-)

    That makes no sense. Why wouldn't it just download straight to the computer in the first place? That's where it's stored, that's where it's streamed from. You just added an extra step and made it that much more complicated.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 – New Continental Mark
  • 1958 – New Continental Mark



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 20, 10:18 AM
    Section 4b: http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/iphone.pdf

    Thanks a lot.

    People are sooo raving about this. Haters. lol. Funny now. :D





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Lincoln Continental MK III
  • Lincoln Continental MK III



  • manosaurus
    Oct 12, 12:57 PM
    My gues is that all these whiners would not even notice if you snuck in at night and swapped out ther procesor for a C2D chip. They'd just wake up the next moring fire up the computer and never even notice.

    It's like those audiophiles who argue endlessly about if gold plated or silver plated speaker wire sounds better.

    Oh... Core 2 Duo gold and silver plated speaker wire tomoorow too!





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Continental Mark Iii
  • 1958 Continental Mark Iii



  • tsadi
    Mar 30, 12:00 PM
    To those bitching a few threads back about no jobs - well, at least the lawyers and linguists get a job.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1969 Lincoln Mark III
  • 1969 Lincoln Mark III



  • toddybody
    Mar 22, 03:21 PM
    Honestly, if it made any sense whatsoever then Apple wouldn't have killed it. Do the math. You're living in the past, kid.

    As an ex-kid I take extreme offense to that statement. Besides, are you really going to tell me Apple makes sense all the time? I guarantee Apple made more money off the 24inch iMac than they did the MacPro for that period...now, with the introduction of the 27inch they wanted to diversify the iMac line more so...hence the 21.5.

    My beef with your original statement stands (as its UBER subjective)...why is a 24inch screen "useless"? What if Apple came out with a 14inch MBP, and I said the 15inch was "useless". Uhhh, thats called an OPINION...look it up grand dad;)





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Lincoln Continental Mark III
  • Lincoln Continental Mark III



  • medster17
    Apr 28, 03:30 PM
    Congratulations to apple, eventually this day had to come. Microsoft has been slacking off in the past few years and this will make them see the larger picture.


    Sent from my iPhone





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark
  • 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark



  • Multimedia
    Sep 12, 04:46 PM
    The way I understood, it was capable of playin that resolution in mp4, but not when using AVC/H.264...Right. Mac res for H.264 WAS 320x240 way too small - only the iPod screen res. So H.264 was unpopular because of this limit. Now if the res limit works on teh existing base of 5G 1st gen Video iPods this is HUGE and changes the game completely. See above I am testing this theory now and will report on the result in about a half hour.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark
  • 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark



  • peeInMyPantz
    Sep 14, 07:02 AM
    Okay, check out this phone and then tell me what you would like to see on your iPhone.

    http://www.vodafone.jp/mb/en/product/3G/905sh/index.html

    http://www.vodafone.jp/mb/en/product/3G/905sh/images/sub_image02.jpg
    this is ugly. i hope iphone is nowhere near this





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark III
  • 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark III



  • crees!
    Sep 12, 04:13 PM
    Do the "older 5G" ipods support the new tv shows (640x480) and movies???? I don't care about the new search and such...Im just wondering about the movies and games.
    Have you seen how searching is done? If not take a look at the page demoing it. It's pretty badass. I just hope an update will include it for my 3G.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. #1- 1958 Lincoln Continental
  • #1- 1958 Lincoln Continental



  • LightSpeed1
    Apr 24, 10:56 PM
    Awesome.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 lincoln continental mark
  • 1958 lincoln continental mark



  • FleurDuMal
    Sep 14, 08:38 AM
    If Apple can show a version of Aperture which will run smoothly on a Mac Pro, then my two grand is practically theirs already...

    An iCamera (CameraPro?) of some kind would be nice, though highly unlikely.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Sun Star 1958 Lincoln
  • Sun Star 1958 Lincoln



  • Silentwave
    Sep 13, 10:13 PM
    There are a lot of sound business reasons for Apple to release an iPhone. But the biggest reason is that Steve must have a cell phone and you know he probably hates the industrial design and functionality.


    I agree. That's our steve all right :D





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. The 1970 Continental Mark III
  • The 1970 Continental Mark III



  • HecubusPro
    Aug 31, 01:28 PM
    It may rely on a few extra things though. Let's say, a video iPod with a big capacity

    Yeah, I hope when the new video iPods come out, storage capacity will be up'd as well. Honestly though, I've so many movies and tv shows on my 30gb video iPod right now, I don't think I'd need much more than a 60gb if I were to upgrade.

    On my 30gb video iPod I've got stuff like all 3 of the LOTR Extended Edition movies, around 150 eps. of various Star Trek tv shows, about 30 Kids in Hall eps., all 3 Star Wars films, tons of music videos, a couple of Harry Potter movies, an anime flick, a bunch of Sealab shorts, some South Park eps. all of the Indiana Jones films, and a few more things. I still have over 7GB free for music as well.

    Having an even bigger capacity drive on my iPod video--I'd go nuts. :)





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Lincoln Continental
  • Lincoln Continental



  • MacRumors
    Aug 31, 11:28 AM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    With few details available, the validity of this remains uncertain, but Electronista claims (http://www.electronista.com/articles/06/08/30/apple.sept.12.press.event/) that Apple may be holding a special press event on September 12th, 2006 based on an "official" email sent to Your Mac Life.

    The date corresponds to the start of Apple Expo Paris (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060821202913.shtml) which runs from September 12th to 16th. It has already been announced, however, that there will be no Keynote event for the Apple Expo.

    Meanwhile, Businessweek (http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/aug2006/db20060831_806225.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_businessweek+exclusives) also places an announcement from Apple in the same time frame. According to their sources, Apple plans to start offering Movie downloads through iTunes in mid-September.

    Finally, many users are expecting (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060814180417.shtml) Apple to release Core 2 Duo based laptops in September, but no further hints of this have been revealed.

    Update: Mac4Ever is also reporting that Apple will be hosting a September 12th Event which will take place in San Francisco and be streamed to London.

    Update 2: MacBidouille confirms that there will be a Keynote in San Francisco that will be relayed to London.
    - It was originally reported that Steve jobs will not deliver a Keynote at Apple Expo. He will indeed not be in Paris; but a Keynote will be organized in cupertino and relayed in London at Apple Europe HeadQuarter, where journalists have already been invited. There will are not relay organized at AppleExpo

    [ digg this ] (http://www.digg.com/apple/Apple_Event_September_12th_Movie_Store)





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Continental Mark III).
  • Continental Mark III).



  • iRun26.2
    Apr 24, 05:37 PM
    Yeah it should be, there's no hard drive to make noise and unless you keep it on a stove or do insanely heavy processing you shouldn't hear the fan either.

    Sandy Bridge should also run more efficiently than the C2D. That will not only extend baterry life, but it will also keep the normal operation temperatures down.

    My only worry is how much I will notice the loss GPU compare to the 320M.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. Lincoln Continental Mark III
  • Lincoln Continental Mark III



  • toddybody
    Mar 22, 03:08 PM
    Nobody wants the 24". That's why they stopped making it. It was useless.

    24 inch useless? Thanks god, for telling us what's what.





    1958 Lincoln Continental Mark Iii. 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark
  • 1958 Lincoln Continental Mark



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 19, 07:03 AM
    I think this may be one of those stories where the media make it sound much bigger than it is. A load of lawyers will make a ton of money and the two companies will come to some sort of licensing agreement or Apple will get a discount on some of the parts they buy.

    Or this will drag out for years and be eventually settled/judged when it is completely irrelevant. Actually, this is the most likely outcome, since all civil lawsuits over IP in the states last for years.

    We'll never quite know what happened nor do I believe anyone will dig deep enough so we actually know Apple's claims in all of this.





    cube
    Mar 30, 01:41 PM
    So, here is an interesting argument, as app is short for Applications, and Applications are a strict subset of programs, doesn't the App Store technically sell Programs, not Apps? Thus, the term is no generic at all. "Program Store" would the generic term. It's the same as a club called "Liqueur Store" (which is TMed.)

    That's like saying it's OK to name a restaurant "Burger Place" because it's technically a "Fast Food Place".





    Satori
    Apr 22, 01:37 AM
    I really hope this happens but I have a feeling that it will be hobbled in some way. If it runs from an iTunes master copy of songs then it might preclude people uploading music that has been ripped from CDs or bought somewhere else (like Amazon).





    Benjy91
    Apr 19, 07:15 AM
    So what? They're already getting sued by Apple, so what's another lawsuit? Point is, contract breach or not, Samsung could cripple Apple's whole ecosystem within days by halting all processor shipments. Apple makes the vast majority on iDevices and this would kill Apple's whole economic model. And this doesn't even account for Samsungs components that go into their Macs. As a result, Apple would have no hardware to sell. They would dip into their treasure chest. It could be devastating to Apple.

    But then they'd have been hammered with 2 law-suits, and then lost their 2nd biggest customer. Thats financial suicide, Apple would find someone else for parts.





    dondark
    Sep 13, 11:46 PM
    EDIT:
    9) Quit asking about live iChat video chat, it AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN. A possible related item would be iChat texting (similar to current AOL, Yahoo, ICQ).[/QUOTE]

    Its just some kind of 3G and Skype technology, It s not hard to do it. But I think Apple isnt rich enuf to do that in the market.





    notabadname
    Apr 4, 12:49 PM
    Normally, with my luck, this would have been the day I would end up setting aside to go in early and get an iPad 2 . . .



    No comments:

    Post a Comment