Popular Post
Recent Post

Monday, May 16, 2011

chocolate bunny what

chocolate bunny what. Medium Chocolate Bunny
  • Medium Chocolate Bunny



  • Eric374
    Apr 30, 04:30 PM
    i think you meant buy one get one free numbers instead of sales. omg i fed the troll.


    android is not a handset manufacturer. it just is a viral mobile platform supplier. it works for them for market share but low on maximum profitability. apple must be appreciated for what they are. Leaders. they did what everyone else was scared to do with smartphones (no stylus) and took the jump into a dead segment (tablets) and they went about it well and reaped the rewards. now johnny come lateley (goog) has come in with the "ours is almost as good but for FREE" and have roped in many marginally satisfied adopters. android's every success is a tribute to its forerunner and DADDY, apple, who still does it best and wont relinquish that fact ever because they Lead the entire industry in all things and they lead well. stop being so butthurt about it and raise your glass to the best. APPL!

    The most factually accurate post in this entire thread.





    chocolate bunny what. chocolate bunny. chocolate
  • chocolate bunny. chocolate



  • digitalnicotine
    Jan 31, 01:47 AM
    @neko girl

    Um... what? I mean what did you purchase? (looks cool) :)





    chocolate bunny what. Chocolate Bunny
  • Chocolate Bunny



  • YoNeX
    Nov 3, 09:49 AM
    Okay, they fixed the Portal, so I was able to download it, a 79.4MB file, lets see how this runs compared to parallels.





    chocolate bunny what. Chocolate Bunny clip art
  • Chocolate Bunny clip art



  • Umbongo
    May 3, 08:02 AM
    How can it be TFT and IPS?!! That makes no sense quite honestly... Pish Posh...

    It doesn't make sense to you because you don't understand the technology.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD





    chocolate bunny what. happy Jesus Resurrection Day
  • happy Jesus Resurrection Day



  • guru_ck
    Apr 22, 04:22 PM
    My favorite iPhone design was the first one. Bring back the aluminum and rounded sides. It's not comfortable to hold this iPhone 4 brick!





    chocolate bunny what. holding a chocolate bunny,
  • holding a chocolate bunny,



  • ChrisTX
    Apr 22, 08:08 PM
    I don't like this wedge fetish Apple is on. Tell me this thing will look better when I sober up. :eek:

    I'm sober and it's not looking all that good from my end. :-/





    chocolate bunny what. chocolate bunny,
  • chocolate bunny,



  • longofest
    Dec 2, 07:26 AM
    The mere fact that some kernel vulnerabilities were discovered in an event SPECIFICALLY devoted to finding such things does not mean our OS X is unsafe. It is by far the MOST secure system out there, with 40 million or 400 million users, and nobody has been able to prove the opposite so far.

    The guy heading up the MOKB thing said that MacOSX's kernel (XNU) was the easiest kernel to crack. If that makes you feel safe, then go ahead and feel safe, but for me, even though I use extremely good security practices and networking measures, I still would rather have Apple get serious aboud security and start hardening their system more so that guys who are only fuzzing and stress testing can't come up with 10 vulnerabilities in a month.

    The only thing I can suggest (which I doubt anyone will follow) is to avoid the hysteria. When a real threat emerges, you'll most likely hear about it long before you are actually in any danger from it.

    Funny thing is that I don't see anyone in this forum going into hysteria about this other than the people saying that "this is a load of FUD." Why is it such a shock that MacOSX can be vulnerable? No, it hasn't been exploited to any large extent, but vulnerabilities open up the door to exploits, and the only thing that is keeping us away from having exploits happen is our market share. You may not want to hear that, but as long as we are below 10% of the market, people simply aren't going to target our vulnerabilities, but are going to target MS's vulnerabilities.

    The problem of course, is that our Market Share is going up, and so we will likely be a larger target for hackers. So if these vulnerabilities keep popping up in this frequency, that becomes a major issue for the exploitation problem as time goes on.





    chocolate bunny what. Dark Chocolate Rabbit Solid (2
  • Dark Chocolate Rabbit Solid (2



  • bushman4
    Apr 12, 11:04 PM
    Iphone 5 looks to be Apples best kept secret yet!
    If everyone remembers prior to the Iphone 4 release no info either until the beta version was found in a bar.
    This year Apple has doubled up its security and seems as though companies producing the parts fear of losing a contract is keeping everything hush-hush.
    Apple not releasing a new IPHONE in June would really pull the stock into the garbage. It would be hard to make up that lost revenue for the quarter.
    One thing I've noticed about all these September rumors is that none of them have any substantiation. I repeat none.





    chocolate bunny what. of a milk chocolate bunny.
  • of a milk chocolate bunny.



  • QCassidy352
    Dec 1, 02:09 PM
    I for one, welcome our new Adware overloards.

    You don't have a sign behind you that says "Hail Adware," do you? ;) :D





    chocolate bunny what. Easter chocolate bunny Royalty
  • Easter chocolate bunny Royalty



  • Skika
    Apr 28, 03:54 PM
    So you actually get MORE iPhone in the white model.

    intradestings





    chocolate bunny what. Lindt Easter Chocolate Bunny
  • Lindt Easter Chocolate Bunny



  • ghostface147
    Apr 28, 04:58 PM
    This is what happens when Apple buys their white iPhones off the street in China. Keeping it real folks...keeping it real......





    chocolate bunny what. Floating chocolate bunny
  • Floating chocolate bunny



  • AidenShaw
    Apr 27, 07:47 AM
    You always seem to forget that Tbolt is a dual bidirectional 10Gb/s channel technology, so in fact it can handle 4 SATA connections, 2 upstream and 2 downstream. With room to spare. On a single port.

    SATA is also bi-directional....


    No need to trash TBolt because it can't handle $50,000+ devices

    Pointing out that TBolt speed is of the same order of magnitude as SATA speed isn't trashing - it's countering some of the TBolt hype. Some people seem to think that TBolt is infinitely fast.

    Agree with you that the real promise of TBolt is to bring PCIe expansion to systems without PCIe slots.





    chocolate bunny what. Diva Da#39; Bunny milk chocolate
  • Diva Da#39; Bunny milk chocolate



  • SciFrog
    Oct 18, 01:53 AM
    This is not a bigadv unit... The fastest machines out there do a frame in 22 mins...


    PS: I am folding on an air, good for 800PPD...





    chocolate bunny what. A milk chocolate bunny
  • A milk chocolate bunny



  • AdeFowler
    Apr 15, 03:44 PM
    I like the new iCal :o





    chocolate bunny what. a real chocolate bunny.
  • a real chocolate bunny.



  • ARF900
    Jan 1, 05:01 PM
    I feel bad for her kids, who are eventually going to have to bring her food when she cant fit out the front door or behind the wheel of a car.





    chocolate bunny what. Boy eating chocolate bunny
  • Boy eating chocolate bunny



  • oingoboingo
    Oct 18, 10:36 PM
    Allready have a Mini but Im going to stick with this chant ,Apple will build a consumer tower, Apple will Build a Consumer Tower,APPLE WILL BUILD A CONSUMER TOWER!:)

    Heh heh...yeah me too. Maybe that's what The Steve (tm) was referring to when he said that '07 was going to be one of the most exciting years for Apple yet.

    Or it could just be a new colour range for the iPod nanos.





    chocolate bunny what. melting chocolate bunny
  • melting chocolate bunny



  • slffl
    Nov 3, 03:12 PM
    Wow, Drag-n-Drop between OSX and Windows. Awesome!!!





    chocolate bunny what. Easter Chocolate Bunny
  • Easter Chocolate Bunny



  • Sounds Good
    Apr 21, 02:27 PM
    Likely the Sandy Bridge. Editing uses CPU power.
    Thanks.





    chocolate bunny what. Chocolate Bunny and chocolate
  • Chocolate Bunny and chocolate



  • res1233
    Apr 13, 10:45 PM
    I'm not sure why we even need an iPhone 5.

    The iPhone 4 is a great form factor. It does the job. At most what it needs is a spec jump (64GB, and maybe clock the CPU faster) and that should hold people over for another year.

    I mean, before we had:

    iPhone
    iPhone 3G
    iPhone 3Gs (pretty much the same form factor but faster CPU)
    iPhone 4

    I suspect we may get an iPhone 4 plus or something like that.

    Also, do you people really need a new phone every year? I had my Treo 650 for nearly four years. The only reason I only kept my Palm Pre for less than a year was that it started having hardware problems.

    This makes me sad. The palm pre part. It was a great phone, but unfortunately its hardware was terrible. It may have been to palm what the iPod was to Apple if only they hadn't slacked in that area. Quite a shame...





    Tones2
    Apr 26, 02:05 PM
    Uh no...

    You need to follow the thread. The poster was using his 2 TB drive as his cloud using a 5$ software.

    Yes.

    My original point is though that, given that you ALREADY have all of your music (and probably videos) stores on your local hard drive of your computer, and have your computer connected to the internet, why the heck would you need APPLE to stream your music from the internet, when you can just buy StreamToMe or Audio Galaxy or 20 other apps that can do this for a $5 TOTAL incremental cost from what you already have. You can stream all of your music, including your already set up playlists, AND your video right from your figgin' hard drive. Why the heck do you need to pay APPLE anything?

    The only benefit I can see it to not eat into your HOME data cap limits, which are usually pretty high anyway (I've NEVER had an issue, and I stream all of the time). But you'd have to upload your non-iTunes purchased songs to their servers anyway, which would offset that somewhat.

    Tony





    dombi
    Jul 21, 10:14 AM
    This is definitely a good thing. Apple has great products and with the Intel processor Macs they offer something that others cannot. Mac/Windows on the same machine without too much headache.

    I have talked to people around me and everyone seems excited about this. Many said before that they would never switch to a Mac because it cannot run Windows, well that changed. So people are starting to realize all the possibilities that they have if do do buy an Apple product.

    I bought a MacBook Pro a while ago and I absolutely love it. Every time I run the 'hostinfo' command I get a little suprised to see the "Intel 80486" part in the output, because we have been staying away from Intel chips for so long. But it does feel and act like a Mac, and even I bought Parallels just o be able to run Windows next to my OS X. It works really well and is fast!

    I hope that this growth will continue. This will be good for the users and for Apple as well.





    ikir
    Apr 12, 03:27 AM
    USB3 is sucky as USB2, fast on sheet, slow in reality.

    Thunderbolt is more like FireWire, fast as hell! You can target mode with thunderbolt, and future SSD external drives or raid will benefit a lot from Thunderbolt.

    USB3 on Mac is useless, just need a Thunderbolt -> USB 3 adapter in case you need to plug an USB3 device and wanting native speed.





    Eidorian
    May 3, 08:12 AM
    The way they've been able to keep the price low while using quad-cores in EVERY iMac has been by downgrading the GPUs. The Graphics Cards in EVERY model are now mobile. In the last line of iMacs they were full powered desktop GPUs.

    So, you see, while there's an upside (the processors), it doesn't come without a down (the GPUs). At first glance I was really annoyed as the �999 one (which is what I got before the refresh) had an i5 quad core, then I saw the graphics memory and got even more annoyed, but THEN I noticed the large shiny M at the end of the GPU name. THAT's how they've been able to bring us them processors and still keep the price down. They've downgraded the GPUs. As my i3 processor practically acts like a quad core anyway and is virtually never pushed to it's limits I think I'm more than happy with what I have. The GPU may only have 256MB dedicated memory but at least it's not mobile.They have been mobile since the switch to Intel. Though the 24" with 7300/7600GT does stand out.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_i5_microprocessors#.22Sandy_Bridge.22_.2832_nm.29_2

    The 2.5GHz and 2.7GHz models look to be Low-Voltage 65W Core i5, which is why Apple is able to fit quad cores in the 21.5" enclosure. But does that actually mean the 3.1GHz Core i5 in the 27" is actually cheaper than the slower 2.7GHz Core i5 in the 27"? Intel doesn't sell a 2.7GHz standard voltage Core i5 unless its a custom model or Apple is underclocking the 2.8GHz Core i5, which seems like an unnecessary waste of free clock speed room.Underclock and relabel is not anything new.





    interconnect
    Mar 31, 06:36 PM
    I hope to GOD this doesn't actually make it to the final product. This is so unbelievably ugly I can't even take it. One of the reasons I love OS X is because of how cohesive it is. Most of the apps follow the interface guidelines which makes it feel unified and not the cobbled together mess that is Windows. To me, this just looks cheesy. It works for iOS but not for the Mac imo.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment