Popular Post
Recent Post

Monday, May 23, 2011

Gmc Savana 2011

Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • aswitcher
    Sep 10, 06:44 AM
    Given this event is on, is this now the only thing going on this week that we expect Apple to release something new?

    I ask because Paris Expo is on and I was wondering if people had reason to believe that might also be used to release new Apple stuff without a keynote.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • QCassidy352
    Jul 14, 10:29 AM
    I'm working with Arn on that one... Woodcrest is pretty much slated towards the PowerMacs. We may have to update the story...

    sorry about that. story updated.

    arn

    yay, I feel special now. ;) Thanks guys. :)

    I really think the iMac should use Conroe now. I think the reason they used the Yonah chip is that they had no desktop "Core" architecture chips available. While using Merom is the easy thing to do, I hope they don't do it. The iMac is supposedly a desktop, it should use a desktop chip.

    My thoughts exactly. Now that intel has a real desktop processor, why shouldn't apple's desktop computer use it?

    Did anyone pay attention to the power and thermal requirements of Conroe?

    The 2.40 and 2.66 (which would be great for the imacs) use 114 Watts at idle and 158-162 at load (http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2795&p=7). Here's info on power draw for original G5s (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=32486), early 2005 G5s (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302439), and late 2005 G5s (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303540). I fail to see the problem. I'm not being flip - I really fail to see the problem. They fit G5s in to imacs, and those power draw numbers look worse than conroe's, unless I'm missing something.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • rmhop81
    Apr 22, 12:30 PM
    Its also not great for many many many other people. You still base your ideas and arguments on the flawed notion that people have unlimited data and could still get it. I will also state again, I personally believe this will be some kind of add-on locker and not replacing local storage. I believe replacing local storage at this point would be a major mistake on Apple's part because it would negatively affect so many people...granted, not all.

    i'm not ignoring any facts. u are being too technical. i have unlimited data but i use less than 2gb. my point is if u are places and it has free wifi, CONNECT to it...which is what i do at work and at home. streaming does not use a lot of data like you think.

    look at the MBA. obviously it's not a computer for you. Doesn't mean it's not a great option for someone else. Storage is minimal and doesn't have a cd drive at all. This is all my wife and i use for a computer. It works great for us.

    do you see now where the future is going with minimal hard drive space and no cd drive???





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • THX1139
    Jul 15, 03:48 AM
    Does anyone think we should be hitting 4ghz about now?

    I mean weve been stuck on 2.x for ages. Whats the deal? A 4ghz quad would be frickin awesome. :confused:

    They have given up on speed and are focussing on multiple processors instead. You will see speed increases but not as often. In the next few years you might see dozens of processors all with Quad or Octo cores instead of just dual core today. IMHO, I prefer additional processors over sheer GHZ anyday. Your 4ghz wish isn't going to mean anything against a Kenstfield in 2007. However, a Quad 4ghz would be sweet... but damn hot.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • iMeowbot
    Sep 14, 11:49 AM
    I know the Merom chip is compatible with the current boards in the CD MBP, but I've never heard anyone actually say that a CD MBP can be upgraded by simply dropping in a Merom chip. Will this be possible?
    Not by mere mortals. The CPU is soldered in. I suppose it's not outside the realm of possibility that Daystar or someone like that would come up with some kind of upgrade service.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • Chris Bangle
    Aug 31, 01:17 PM
    these obviosly gonna be optimizd for the full screen ipod, whats wrong with avi format anyway.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • DMann
    Sep 9, 01:55 AM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    MacCentral posted (http://www.macworld.com/2006/09/firstlooks/imacbench/index.php) a first look at the new Core 2 Duo iMac along with some early benchmarks.

    The new iMacs which were released on Wednesday (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/09/20060906091309.shtml) incorporate the latest Core 2 Duo processor from Intel. The Core 2 Duo represents the continuation of the Core Duo line which first made its appearance in Apple computers in January. Intel has maintained that the new chips would provide roughly 20% improvement in performance.

    MacCentral tested the new 17" 2GHz iMac and 20" 2.16GHz iMac and compared them to the previous 20" 2GHz Core Duo and the 2.66GHz Mac Pro.

    The most direct comparison between the two processors comes between the 17" 2GHz Core 2 Duo iMac and the 20" 2GHz Core Duo iMac. The overall score was 10% better in the new model while the individual tests showed gains up to 20%.

    Wonder how the 24" iMac at 2.33GHz will fare.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • alent1234
    Apr 29, 03:22 PM
    that was in 2005 when it first came out. by now they are on a revision that costs a lot less to make and they have sold a lot of games and XBL subs to make up for it. back when the 360 first came out it had an attach rate of 8 games, higher than Sony. figure at $10 licensing per game that's $80 per console on average plus XBL. so i don't know if the isuppli numbers are accurate.

    a lot of companies in the console market have been doing it like this for years. take a loss the first year or two, sell break even or small profit later in the cycle and make it up on the games. except for nintendo which is doing the opposite. make money early in the cycle and start losing money at the end of the cycle.

    2011 the division will probably turn a profit of $3 to $4 billion or so due to kinect. 2010 was also profitable. if the Nokia partnership works out 2012 will be even better.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • ezekielrage_99
    Oct 12, 09:29 PM
    I wont buy one because Bono the big hypocrit and Oprah the Evil Overload of the Airwaves are endorsing them........

    It kind of takes the "cool" factor out of having a red one.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • firsttube
    Sep 13, 09:40 PM
    seems as if the clickwheel being at the very bottom would make it a bit easier to drop, no?





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • After G
    Sep 14, 02:17 AM
    I think that the phone interface won't have a click-wheel. Rather, it will be all screen with an on-screen wheel changing to an on-screen keypad. No slider action whatsoever. Maybe a hard switch for on/off, answer, and phonebook, but that's about all I'd put on the phone. It'll save on cost and hardware complexity too, not having to include a wheel.

    Interface? Regular phone ... may be a smartphone if they figure out how to do the keyboard. Input is always questionable on small devices because there isn't room. Bluetooth perhaps? That's more $ down the drain for a keyboard :(

    I hope I have the funds to buy one when one of these suckers comes out. Both GSM and CDMA would be better, but if there's only one, it should be GSM. It's easier for people to switch their phones that way, instead of having the cellphone stores cluttered up.

    Good thing my sister's RAZR is dying ... maybe I'll tell her to get someone else's phone (on the cheap) when these drop (if she doesn't have enough for an Apple phone).





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • sushi
    Sep 20, 03:24 AM
    I would be exstatic to get a 720p movie, and like you, I would certainly have no problem waiting the time it would take to download it. I just want HD downloadable content from iTMS, which is why the iTV has me so excited. I may hold off on getting that HD-DVD player until I learn more about it.
    And the download, would be platform independent with regards to BluRay or HD-DVD. Cool.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • nemaslov
    Sep 19, 04:19 PM
    I too would love the collection/library to increase, but for me, the cost of a DVD is virtually the same. It is not like music where you can buy one track off an album.I have a fairly high end system with a 50" HD Plasma, and just got the 80GB iPod which for me is only for music. I love to take a whole collection on the road with me. 20,000 songs!!!.

    I also have a pretty good size DVD collection and the quality and lack of limitations for me to play that DVD ....ANYWHERE is worth a few more bucks. The music I already play at home from my iMac and backup hard drives and even though not the same quality as a CD. it is great for background music or parties.

    I also live in a fairly big City (San Francisco) with one of the best record stores in the World: Amobea Music, where I can trade or sell the CDs or DVDs that I don't want. They have the most extensive collection of new and used DVDs of anywhere I know.

    So say I buy a turkey or simply tired of a film, I can sell it for maybe 3 or 4 bucks or better yet TRADE it for store credit of about 4-6 bucks. That ends up being cheaper than I would pay via any online source abut then I would end up getting a new film for a net cost of under ten bucks. Sometimes even less. If I tire of a download...there is no way I can trade up..





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • MacBytes
    Dec 30, 08:21 AM
    http://www.macbytes.com/images/bytessig.gif (http://www.macbytes.com)

    Category: Apple Software
    Link: Apple Faces Increasing Cyber Threats, McAfee Says (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20101230092111)
    Description:: McAfee Inc. expects Apple��s iPhone, geolocation services such as Foursquare, and mobile devices to be the target of malware attacks in 2011. The computer security company also predicts attackers targeting shortened URL services and internet TV platforms as well as a rise in politically motivated hacktivisim, as more groups are expected to repeat the WikiLeaks example.

    ��We��ve seen significant advancements in device and social network adoption, placing a bulls-eye on the platforms and services users are embracing the most. These platforms and services have become very popular in a short amount of time, and we��re already seeing a significant increase in vulnerabilities, attacks and data loss,�� said Vincent Weafer, senior vice president of McAfee Labs.

    McAfee Labs Threat Predictions for 2011:

    * Apple: No longer flying under the radar

    McAfee said the popularity of iPads and iPhones, combined with the lack of user understanding of proper security for these devices, will increase the risk for data and identity exposure, and will make Apple botnets and Trojans a common occurrence.



    Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
    Approved by Mudbug





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • paradox00
    Apr 14, 04:53 PM
    Very true, but in the end, USB2 won out.

    Cere, on page one, you DID state that TB would (a) be mac only and (b) die and you've been backtracking terribly ever since.

    When you make a statement such as "unfortunately, also bingo" you are giving your full endorsement to that statement and you have accepted that as your own opinion with no ifs, ands or buts. In case you've forgotten, you gave your full endorsement to this quote:


    USB3=native to all platforms
    TB=Mac Only

    Sounds like TB just died.

    Since then, you've argued that what you really meant was that PC manufacturers wont support it (without proof to back up your claims) and made poor comparisons to Firewire.

    Let's compare the two for a second:

    FW was pushed by Apple
    TB is being pushed by Apple, but more importantly Intel (whose chips power most PCs)

    FW had a high per port licensing cost
    TB uses a royalty free port and support will be built into future Intel chipsets (making PC implementation virtually inevitable)

    FW was slower than USB on paper, but faster in reality
    TB blows USB 3.0 out of the water, both on paper and in reality

    Why do you keep insisting they are the same and will share the same fate? On top of that, as I mentioned earlier (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=12392173&postcount=63) (and no one, including yourself has attempted to refute) TB isn't even a direct competitor with USB, it's more of a complimentary technology. You've done nothing in this thread but blow hot air.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • gugy
    Sep 26, 02:30 PM
    Hey I'm satisfied with my carrier. I think the last time I had any problems with coverage was back in the 20th century. I've got coverage even in the freaking underground. I'd have coverage in the middle of wilderness if I chose to go there. It's cheap as well, I never pay incoming calls, my phone has never been locked and it works pretty much all over the world, my operator has had packet data connection most of this century as well and 3g for several years. What more could I wish?

    I guess you are a lucky dude!





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • SC68Cal
    Aug 28, 06:57 PM
    They're not. You're seriously whining about "taking so long" when the first announcements came *earlier today*? Really? A "delay" of HOURS is something shareholders are going to freak out over???

    Why don't you read the rest of my statement, fanboy?


    If Apple announces that the new Merom laptops are available and are ready to ship that day, then it isn't a big deal.





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • YEMandy
    Sep 12, 03:35 PM
    o dude ;)

    that was really, really reassuring and comforting!!! thank you :D


    well yes i might try that, but even if my attempt failed i won't bother to manage to get the new one, cause as you pointed out, there obviously aren't that much of major differences, as most of us seem to agree upon.....


    anyway,,,
    right now i'm in korea, and it's 5:30 in teh morning... had to stay up all night to get the live broadcast.... it was very enthralling and stuff, all was good except that it'd hurt my productivity today.... haha

    well just saying!


    Take it back!! They will give you another one with NO questions asked!! See upper posts!





    Gmc Savana 2011. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • NickFalk
    Apr 29, 06:48 AM
    Three points:




    jholzner
    Aug 24, 08:20 AM
    may be Creative could use this precedence to sue Microsoft and other competitors over their UI and make them pay for licenses too.

    There's not real precedence since Apple settled. If it had gone to court and Apple lost, then there would be a precedence.





    torbjoern
    Apr 25, 02:50 AM
    conditional love. AKA the love of a spoiled brat.

    And it's worth... ****-all...

    Am I the only one that thinks this kid is completely FOS? He's that guy who has to torment everyone and lie about how smart and rich he is to make himself feel better about his shallow, lonely, crappy life. Typical internet tough guy.

    Dude, good luck at "Harvard". You wouldn't last 10 minutes.

    You certainly ain't the only one. Obvious troll is obvious.





    mojohojo
    Apr 19, 11:12 PM
    what if samsung got rid of their UI and used Android?
    then it would be just like any other smart phone on the market.

    **** apple! lets all email our thoughts to steve jobs





    polyesterlester
    Aug 31, 05:49 PM
    I have a feeling Ted Stevens won't appreciate Apple's movie store. It'll take his staff weeks to send him an internet.





    TangoCharlie
    Jul 14, 09:34 AM
    Woohoo! 3GHz here we come. As was mentioned before, though, a mid-sized tower priced at the iMac level (but upgradable) would be the final logical step in the Apple product line. That would leave Woodcrest to the high end MacPro with its quad configuration.

    The fasted Core 2 Extreme at launch will be 2.93 (ok, that's pretty close to 3GHz).... however, if we're going QUAD, then we're looking at Xeon 5100 series
    and the 5050, 5060 and 5080 will be 3GHz and above!

    What about a a Mac Pro with dual 3.73 GHz Xeon 5080's?? :D

    We might need an enclosure the size of the G5 for those!! :eek:

    I agree, there's space int he Apple line-up for a single cpu (Conroe) system which is aimed to business and people who want the upgradeability of a "box" but don't want to splash out on dual Xeons!!



    No comments:

    Post a Comment